A boost for e-publishing brands

The global publishing brand, Macmillan has reportedly withdrawn its e-book titles from being sold for Amazon brand’s Kindle reader.

Apple announced at the end of January that Macmillan was part of a group of major publishers that would sell their titles on Apple’s ibookstore designed for the iPad.

Apple is letting publishers charge more than the $9.99 which Amazon set for titles sold for its Kindle.

Under the Apple understanding, publishers set their own e-book prices, with Apple profiting from 30 per cent of the revenue. This is expected to raise many e-book titles to $12.99 and $14.99.

Whilst not being as ambient-light ‘friendly’ as products like the Kindle or Sony e-reader, the iPad does allows embedded multimedia as well as colour (making it ideal for publishers of textbooks).

Trouble ahead for iPad?

In designing the iPad, Apple reportedly overlooked incorporating the ability for viewers to see Flash-enabled content.

Equally, and from a branding point of view, potentially more problematical, rival technology brand Fujitsu claims that the name iPad is theirs.

It’s our understanding that the name is ours,” Fujitsu’s PR director Masahiro Yamane reported inThe New York Times last week.

The Fujitsu iPad – a touchscreen mobile device used in point-of-sale –  was launched in 2002.

One of the many other ipads out there

iPad, iPad …everywhere

Another tech-brand, Magtek manufactures its own iPad – an encrypted encrypted credit-card swiper.

And  it doesn’t stop there…

… Seimens uses the name: ‘iPad’, in combination with its engines and motors.

A Canadian company called Coconut Grove Pads Inc. offers polyurethane bra inserts and shoulder pads registered as the iPad.

Coconut Grove’s president, Hylton Karon, described the products as:

“…You know, little quickies you ladies use to enhance.”

The company, which manufactures bras under the brand name The Natural, owns the iPad trademark in the United States.

With so many iPads being marketed on the web, even YouTube is enjoying an unexpected lift on its site.

embedded by Embedded Video

Back to serious business…

The New York Times reported that in July, Apple “used a proxy to apply for an international trademark for the iPad,” it has since submitted multiple requests for additional time to contest Fujitsu’s application.  Apple reportedly has until the end of February to decide whether it will formally contest Fujitsu’s right to the name “iPad.”

Jonathan Gabay

www.brandforensics.co.uk

Share on Facebook

Bookmark to: